Stream: Learning through unions


PDF version available for download (PDF help)

TUC Education European Review

Issue 43 July 2008

Welcome to the seventeenth issue of the new-look European Review which will be emailed four times a year as a supplement to those registered to receive TUC Education Update. A hard copy will also be posted to Union Education Officers, TUC course co-ordinators and tutors. Everyone with an interest in European affairs as they affect trade unionists can still access the magazine online at http://www.tueip.dircon.co.uk/ or at http://www.unionlearn.org.uk/education/index.cfm?mins=88

Bargaining round up

GERMAN WORKERS ARE TO BENEFIT from bigger pay increases than for some time after the latest round of wage negotiations. However they may have to work longer hours to get the money. Public sector employees will receive an extra 3.1% backdated to the beginning of the year together with a €50 supplement; next year there will be another increase of 2.8% plus a €225 lump sum for lower grades. Local government employees will also see their work hours go up by 30 minutes per week. Hospital staff will receive only a 1.6% rise this year but will get 4.3% in 2009 without the lump sum.

A 25-month deal in the chemicals sector will give 550,000 workers a 4.4% rise backdated to March plus another 3.3% next year. One-off payments of 0.5% of pay for each of the first 13 months of the agreement will depend on the financial position of each individual company. The chemicals agreement also covers training, flexible transition to retirement, pensions and working-time accounts in which holiday entitlement can be converted into financial credits.

MALTA'S LARGEST PRIVATE EMPLOYER, STMicroelectronics, which is facing tough market conditions due to the decline in the value of the US dollar, has been prevented from taking it out on their workers. The company indicated that it would suspend pay rises scheduled for the period 2006-2010.

However the GWU trade union insisted that its collective agreement with STM was honoured, threatening industrial action. In response the company announced 'down-sizing' while Malta's Employment and Training Corporation estimates that the workforce has already been reduced by 400 over the last 16 months. The union pointed out that new employees were still being started and fears that the new recruits will be on inferior contracts.

ITALIAN UNIONS HAVE RESORTED TO STRIKE ACTION to try and close a loophole which has left construction workers as the only group who cannot claim sick pay for the first three days of absence. Although it is possible to achieve this through negotiation at company level, unions say that this has proved impossible in companies employing 45% of all building workers. They are also worried about an increase in part time contracts. Franco Martini, the general secretary of FILEA-CGIL, commented: 'The excessive use of part-time contracts may be a way to hide clandestine labour and we should absolutely limit this negative practice'. On pay they are demanding an extra €105 a month as the industry is growing.

Revised Works Council directive published

FOLLOWING EXTENSIVE CONSULTATION THE European Commission has published its plans for the revision of the European Works Council (EWC) directive. Having received feedback that indicated that employers' organisations were against revision whereas unions were in favour the Commission asked for examples of best practice and how to promote their creation.

EWC.jpg

They concluded that action by the EU was necessary and consulted the social partners on what form it should take. At this point the employers in the shape of Business Europe offered to open negotiations with the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) with a view to agreeing the new law as part of the social dialogue instead of it being initiated by the Commission in the usual way.

However the ETUC, smelling a rat, was concerned that this could not be done by next year's European Parliament elections, in which case the proposal would fall, and appealed to the Commission to bring in the revision. Because the employers wanted to follow a different route they did not offer their suggestions as to the substance of the revision so it was no surprise that the Commission's proposals seemed to please the unions more. They include reference to training of EWC union members and the role of trade unions in supporting them, the responsibility of a firm in providing the necessary information to set up a new EWC, ways to adapt or continue a works council in the event of restructuring, mergers etc. as well as general principles and definitions of 'information' and 'consultation'.

It also sets out more detailed guidelines on things like the ratio of EWC reps. to employees, the role of experts whom they may call upon and the topics that should be discussed at EWCs as opposed to national level.

One union demand that has not been met is the reduction of the minimum number of workers that a multinational company has to employ to come under the legislation; on the grounds of proportionality this stays at 1,000 with 150 or more in at least two Member States. Despite this ETUC reaction was generally favourable 'We strongly support the opinion of the Commission that EWCs must be in a position to play their full part with regard to development in undertakings, anticipating and accompanying change' stated Reiner Hoffmann, Deputy General Secretary. Business Europe came near to condemning the plans however. In a letter to the Commission, Secretary General Philippe de Buck says that more than 800 leading European companies 'fear that their operations could be hampered through this proposal'. Among several references to trade unions in the letter he claims that this 'dramatic rewriting' will 'offer new tools to help trade unionism strengthen its grip on day-to-day functioning of EU companies'. Calling the proposals bureaucratic he went on 'too many rules are introduced which all go in the same direction: giving more power to trade-unionism without improving effectiveness of information and consultation'.

How the Commission reacts to these influences pulling in different directions will help to decide whether workers renew their faith in the EU, according to ETUC General Secretary John Monks. 'the Commission as well as the parliament and the Council must prove that they are able and ready to strengthen workers' rights and the social dimension of the European Union' he said.

Unions want to rescue Posted Workers directive from courts

AS WE OUTLINE BELOW, THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE recently struck another blow against the right of workers posted from one EU Member State to another to enjoy the same pay and benefits as local employees. The case, brought by the European Commission against Luxembourg, turned on whether national laws, which enforced such conditions as a written contract of employment and cost of living increases in wages for foreign workers, were compatible with the Posted Workers directive. In finding that Luxembourg had gone further than the directive intended the court followed the path it had taken in the Laval and Rüffert cases (see past issues) in gradually restricting the ability of national governments to protect posted workers.

Even before the latest judgment the European Parliament, the Council of Ministers, the Commission and the ETUC had considered the working of the directive. The parliament's Employment Committee was worried about the popularity of the EU with workers if local labour standards were undermined and the problem of attracting skilled employees from outside the EU if they were only guaranteed minimum conditions, while the Council of Ministers advocated exchange of information and best practice on the directive between Member States. The Commission seemed convinced that the legislation was not working properly and admitted that posted workers could be at risk but it recommended more co-operation between countries and access to information rather than reform.

The European Trade Union Confederation were, however, convinced that the law should be revised, and, further, urged 'the European institutions to adopt a Social Progress protocol at the next Treaty revision, confirming the primary goal of the EU as being the improvement of living and working conditions of its workers' in the words of General Secretary John Monks. It predicts that the judgment will have an impact throughout the EU, especially in countries such as France which have similar labour laws to Luxembourg's, and that the number of posted workers will increase from the current one million when the new Services directive is implemented next year. The Party of European Socialists (PES), which might be expected to initiate the directive's revision, is undecided on the practicality of getting it changed before the European Parliament elections in 2009.

Companies to promote equality as EU shows size of problem at the top

RECENT REPORTS TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION HAVE AGAIN HIGHLIGHTED the unequal distribution of the sexes among top jobs. At the same time, one Member State, France, is attempting to enforce a better deal for all women at work. Women and men in decision-making 2007; analysis of the situation and trends investigates the make-up of parliaments, regional assemblies, governments, central banks, companies, public administration and the judiciary to see how many decision-makers are female. In France the new parenthood charter, backed by the Ministry of Labour has been signed by 29 companies to make sure mothers, and parents in general, are not discriminated against in their career development.

According to the EU report 30% is the crucial figure for female employment at which a critical mass is formed that can influence politics. This would be a considerable advance for most of the bodies surveyed. National parliaments contain an average of 24% of women, regional assemblies 30% and cabinets of Member State governments 24%.

There is no female central bank governor in the EU and five times as many men as women are financial decision-makers. In business generally the higher the level the fewer are the women employed: 44% of all workers, 32% as heads of small businesses but only 10% of board members in leading companies. In public administration the position has improved in recent years with women now comprising a third of those at or near the top although the EU institutions themselves have only a 20% female representation. The judges in the highest courts of the Community are 30% women.

As well as trying to change this state of affairs, the French charter attempts to make human resources departments more aware of the position of working parents and to prevent and eliminate practises that discriminate against them. The Minister of Labour, Xavier Bertrand, believes that 'improving the position of parents in companies is a choice made by society, which takes the form of very concrete measures, such as working time reorganisation, telework and the management of departures and returns to work linked to maternity leave'. Some Spanish companies have also acted on these issues; a large department store chain, El Corte Inglés, has concluded an 'Equality Plan' with trade unions with the aim of preventing all forms of gender discrimination at work. 62% of their 67,000 employees are women but they are under-represented in technical occupations and only 22% of managers are female.

The company promises positive discrimination where candidates are equally qualified, 40-60% of places on management training courses to go to women, examination of pay structures, greater working time flexibility and action against sexual harassment. Unions say the plan has possibilities but will be 'very demanding' and believe that the pay equality provisions are weak.

Women and men in decision-making 2007; analysis of the situation and trends can be downloaded from: http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social

Commission expands anti-discrimination directive pleasing unions and campaign groups

A MATTER OF WEEKS AFTER THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION had let it be known that its new legislation outlawing discrimination outside the workplace would only cover disability, the finally revealed proposal proved to have a much wider scope. Trade unions and campaign groups had lobbied for the new law to prohibit all the grounds included in the earlier Employment Equality Directive and it seems that their effort has paid off.

Discrimination due to age, sexual orientation, and religion as well as disability will be forbidden in the provision of goods and services including health, housing, education and social security, joining the existing provisions for race and gender. It will cover both direct and indirect discrimination, harassment and victimisation. Exceptions will be allowed for 'generally accepted practices' such as discounts for senior citizens or age limits for the consumption of alcohol. National laws which protect certain religions or maintain the secular nation of the state will also be beyond the new directive. The Commission believes that the role of the 'national equality bodies' such as the Equality and Human Rights Commission in the U.K. is vital in giving advice and going to court if need be.

The new directive will form part of a package of measures to set up an expert panel to examine the effectiveness of anti-discrimination policies, to raise the awareness of rights under both the new and existing laws, to encourage Member States to adopt positive action to achieve equality, to require better collection of data and to persuade companies of the business case for diversity in the workforce and among customers.

There will also be a special EU Roma summit in September as the Commission believes that 'the marginalisation of millions of people is unacceptable above all from the perspective of equality and effective enjoyment of human rights' and promises it will 'remain vigilant in this area and will step up its work with national equality bodies to improve their capacity to tackle cases of discrimination against Roma'.

Reaction to the proposal has been positive. The European Trade Union Federation (ETUC) issued a statement warmly welcoming it, also signed by a range of campaigning organisations. The British TUC found some reasons for confusion on the scope of the directive however, especially in the field of accommodation and education of disabled people, and adoption by same-sex couples.

Corporate Justice campaign comes to Brussels

CAMPAIGNERS FOR CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILTY (CSR) came to the European Parliament recently to try to persuade legislators to toughen up laws holding multi-national companies responsible for their actions outside the EU. Following a resolution in March in which the parliament called for victims in the third world to be able to use European courts to seek redress, mandatory disclosure of all corporate lobbying and the establishment of an Ombudsman for CSR, the European Coalition for Corporate Justice (ECCJ) put forward further proposals at a conference in Brussels.

ECCJConf
Bernadette Ségol and Frank Bsirske, union delegates at the conference

The coalition, which includes over 250 civil society organisations from across Europe, was unhappy that the resolution still defined CSR as essentially voluntary and that provisions for company reports to include social and environmental sections were weakened. 'These proposals will provide long needed justice for victims of environmental or human rights abuses by companies based in Europe' said ECCJ coordinator Ruth Casals.

New EU safety law REACHes out to USA

THE EUROPEAN CHEMICALS AGENCY (ECHA) began its work in June. Its task is to implement the new regulations on the Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals or REACH. The Helsinki-based organisation will be required to receive registrations for about 30,000 substances which are used in quantities of greater than one tonne annually. The ETUC is planning to draw on its network of unions and reps. to distribute its own information on the new law of which, it says, many employers are ignorant.

However the effects of the legislation are also likely to be felt far beyond EU borders. Already manufacturers in the USA are looking at the composition of substances that they use. Although American regulations are much laxer than REACH, requiring the authorities to prove that a chemical is harmful before it can be restricted, companies do not want to lose access to a market of nearly 500 million people. DuPont is to register about 500 substances including 20-30 expected to make the list of substances of 'very high concern' created by the European legislation. It is quite likely that other US firms are using such substances as the US Environmental Protection Agency has only banned 5 chemicals since 1976! Even if they are authorised in the EU consumers could shun them as experience with, for instance, lead in toys and phthalates in baby rings has shown parental anxiety trumping corporate lobbying. Instead companies may find it easier to substitute: 'We're not looking at this as a European program - we're buying and selling all over the globe' commented a vice president of DuPont.

Nanotechnology can create jobs but precautions needed

ALTHOUGH THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RECENTLY rejected special measures to deal with products made with the emerging nanotechnology (see our last issue) both the EU Commission and the ETUC have their eye on their health and safety aspects. The Commission has started a 'public dialogue' by noting the huge potential of the scientific advance which manipulates materials at the atomic level. They say that 10 million jobs could be created by 2014 to service a market worth between €750 and €2000 billion. While energy efficiency, computer memories, pharmaceuticals and medical procedures could all benefit, the Commissioners stress that public knowledge of the technology must be increased in the EU and a precautionary principle must apply to protect health, the environment and workers' safety.

CarbonNanotube.jpg
Looking down a model carbon nanotube

This accords with the view of the European Trade Union Confederation who made it the key demand of a recent resolution. They stress that REACH, the newly implemented directive controlling the use of chemicals, must apply to their nanometre forms, even if they would otherwise be exempt as less than one tonne per year is imported or manufactured. The ETUC wants the 'no data, no market' principle to apply. They say that workers and unions must be involved in the assessment and reduction of nanomaterial-related risks, worker information, training and health monitoring must be improved where they may be exposed to products containing nanos and safety data sheets must state whether nanomaterials are present.

Medical opinion would seem to support this approach with parallels being drawn with the asbestos disaster. Indeed an editorial in Lancet Oncology comments that carbon nanotubes have a similar structure to asbestos and have also been found to cause mesotheloma in mice: 'our physical and chemical knowledge of these molecules exceeds our biological understanding of their effects'.

Temps and working time: EU cuts Gordian knot at last thanks to TUC

The revision of the Working Time directive and a proposed Temporary Agency Workers directive are two pieces of legislation that have been stuck in the EU sausage machine for many years. At times linked and at others separated, the UK has been seen as the main obstacle to both of them. Now an agreement in Britain seems to have untangled them. We examine how much unions and workers stand to gain.

IT WAS WAY BACK IN 2001 THAT the social partners, in the shape of the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) and Business Europe (then UNICE) decided that they differed too much over the proposal for a new law on temporary agency workers to agree a directive. The ETUC then called on the European Commission to put forward a bill in the normal way. Ever since that time it has proved impossible to get a majority in the Council of Ministers for any text, with the UK usually organising the blocking minority. Similarly the British exemption to the Working Time directive ran out in November 2003 and, despite numerous deals on the table, nothing could get past the Council until now.

At the end of May the TUC, CBI and the British government came to an agreement under which agency workers must be treated equally with comparable permanent employees after twelve weeks in a job. On the basis of this, the government dropped its opposition in the Council of Ministers and a version of the new law, which allowed for this compromise, was waved through. At the same meeting a proposal to revise the Working Time directive was also agreed. The compromise here was to keep the UK opt-out but tighten up on its conditions.

The details of the temporary workers law mean that pensions can be withheld from agency employees in the UK, although sick pay and holidays are covered, that measures to stop employers using repeated contracts of less than twelve weeks will be put in place and that 'local agreements', for instance at company level, cannot have less favourable terms than the national deal. In the case of working time the fine print comes in several shades of grey.

Although workers in the UK will be able to sign away their right not to work more than 48 hours per week they cannot do so before they start work or during their first month on the job. They can also opt-in again, without notice, during the first six months. Any opt-out has to be renewed every year and employers must keep records of the actual hours worked by opted-out workers. No employee covered by the proposed directive can work more than 60 hours per week on average over a three month period. On the other hand none of these limits will apply to workers employed for less than ten weeks per year by the same company and the problem of on-call time, which came up in court cases at the European Court of Justice, has been resolved by distinguishing between 'active' and 'inactive' hours which will be difficult to define.

Unions seemed more pleased with the first deal than the second. 'The agreement on a directive on temporary agency workers was positive and shows that the European Union can legislate improvements for workers', said John Monks General Secretary of the ETUC. But in the same comment he went on 'but the agreement on working time is highly unsatisfactory and unacceptable to the ETUC, in respect of the new provisions on on-call work and the continuation of the UK opt-out'.

They promised to keep up the fight for a better deal on working time. Both measures will now go to the European Parliament and the socialist group of MEPs intend to reject that proposal. PES spokesman Stephen Hughes said: 'This is a health and safety law - and as a point of principle there should be no room for an opt-out'. If the parliament and the Council of Ministers cannot agree, the conciliation procedure will be followed which will not finish until the end of the year. As the Member States will then have the usual three years to implement the directive, it is unlikely to be fully operational before 2012. The law will be reviewed four years after this and there is no guarantee that the UK opt-out will be retained.

Irish unions seek law change as Labour Court hobbled by Ryanair case

As we reported last year the Irish Labour Court performs a variety of functions which have no equivalent in the UK . However its ability to intervene in disputes where no trade union is recognised has become more problematic since a Supreme Court judgment in favour of Ryanair. Now unions want a mandatory recognition law.

Where trade unionists in Ireland work in companies which do not recognise them for collective bargaining purposes, they have recourse to a 2001 law that allows the Labour Court to investigate disputes and impose settlements. However after the Supreme Court found that the existence of a trade dispute at Ryanair had not been proved by the Labour Court, and accepted that the company's 'employee representative councils' were genuine bargaining units, the unions believe that any employer can circumvent the legislation. As well as setting up spurious 'internal forums' rogue employers could also victimise individual union members as the Ryanair judgment said that their identities must be disclosed. The solution, according to the unions, is compulsory recognition.

They raised the issue during the current talks with the government as part of the national partnership agreement known as 'Towards 2016'. The Irish government does not favour mandatory union recognition because it believes that employers would not agree to it. If it was then imposed, the government feels that there would be negative effects on the social partnership which has helped to attract investment to Ireland as a country that settles such issues by consensus. Some lawyers also consider that a constitutional referendum would be required to validate legislation. Instead, the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment is proposing amendments to the existing law to tighten up rules on what constitutes a negotiating body in a company and to allow the Labour Relations Commission to verify union membership figures confidentially.

This issue and others such as pay and the position of temporary agency workers are set to bedevil the national talks now being held in a tougher economic climate.

THIS ITEM IS BASED ON INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN EMPLOYMENT REVIEW

Recent rulings from the European Court of Justice

ECJ turns Posted Workers directive on its head

In our last issue we reported on the Rüffert case in which the court had quoted the Posted Workers directive to prevent a local authority from enforcing wage levels in companies to which it contracts out work. Now the ECJ has extended this approach in restricting how a Member State can interpret the directive. It upheld a complaint by the European Commission that Luxembourg laws requiring foreign contractors to provide a written contract of employment, to raise pay with the cost of living and to respect collective agreements and rules on part-time work went further than the directive intended. Originally brought in to guarantee minimum standards for workers posted abroad it is now being used as 'an aggressive internal market tool' according to John Monks of the ETUC who demanded its revision.

Survivor's benefit must be paid to same-sex partners

A Mr. Maruko from Germany has won his case in which he claimed discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation against the Theatre Pensions Institution. In 2001 he entered a long-term relationship as a registered life partnership under German law. His partner had worked in the theatre since 1959 and was bound by law to join the pension scheme. When the partner died in 2005 Mr. Maruko applied for a survivor's benefit but was refused. The court agreed that the Pensions Institution rules were discriminatory as a widow's or widower's pension would have been payable. There may be interesting side-effects for British law because the ECJ did not limit the retrospective application of its judgment. The UK Sexual Orientation Regulations restrict the qualifying period for same-sex survivor's benefits to starting in 2005 when Civil Partnerships were first instituted here.

H & S strike, law in Italy after more disasters

ITALY'S POOR RECORD ON HEALTH AND SAFETY was again highlighted by a recent accident, although this time both government and unions seem to be in a mood to remedy matters. After six workers were killed in a water purification tank in Sicily, adding to those burned to death in a steel mill in Turin and crushed at a transport depot at Bergamo last year, a nationwide strike of metalworkers was called for June 17th. One of the aims of the strike was to prevent employers watering down a new law brought in by the outgoing government of Romano Prodi.

The legislation will increase inspection, simplify administration and promote consultation between the social partners. It will also recruit local health and safety reps to cover small businesses, exclude firms which break safety laws from public contracts and give inspectors the right to immediately suspend work. All companies will have to submit a risk assessment within three months of the law coming into effect. Any infringement of these provisions will result in severe financial penalties and this is one of the employers' complaints. The Confindustria confederation argues that the sanctions are excessive. Its director general, Maurizio Beretta, stated that: 'Italian companies invest €12 billion a year to improve health and safety. We should all do more, but sanctions alone cannot solve this delicate and complex problem'. It is thought that the new centre-right Berlusconi administration will be sympathetic and has already promised to reopen negotiations.

By contrast trade unions want all of the new law to be implemented as they believe that the official figures showing 1,350 fatalities per year and 1 million workplace accidents are an underestimate. They point to the prevalence of illegal migrant employment uncovered by a recent inspection blitz which resulted in 36,000 undeclared employees gaining a proper contract. One of the reasons that inspectors can use to close down a company is a workforce containing more than 20% of illegal workers.

First 2-year campaign is on risk assessment

FOR THE FIRST TIME THE European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) has devoted two years of campaigning to a particular topic. Replacing the usual, annual event which culminates in the European Safety Week in October, Healthy Workplaces. Good for you. Good for business will stress the value of risk assessment and concentrate on construction, healthcare agriculture and small businesses (SMEs).

According to EU-OSHA director Jukka Takala 'risk assessment is not necessarily complicated, bureaucratic or a task only for experts. This is a mistaken belief that is particularly common among SMEs'. The campaign is part of the EU Strategy for Health and Safety at Work which aims to reduce accidents at work by 25% by 2012, particularly in the high-risk sectors.

As well as the health of workers, the campaign will seek to communicate the business benefits of risk assessment in reducing absenteeism and insurance costs and raising employee motivation and productivity. 'Every year, millions of workers in the EU are involved in accidents which force them to stay at home for at least three working days at an enormous cost to the economy. Risk assessment is the key to reducing these figures', said EU Commissioner for Employment Vladimir Špidla 'but it can only be the first step - implementation must follow'.

Explosion rocks Ukraine mine again

A SERIES OF ACCIDENTS HAVE occurred in coal mines in the Ukraine over recent years (see issue 41). Yet another disaster took place in June when 37 miners were trapped after a blast at the Karl Marx pit at Yenakiyevo. Despite the suspension of mining in the area after 11 fatalities in May it is believed that the workers were digging for coal rather than carrying out safety measures as first thought. President Yuschenko branded the government 'irresponsible' in its approach to the industry.

UkraineMineBlast.jpg
Surface damage from the blast at the Ukrainian mine

Car ads to follow cigarette warnings

THE EU COMMISSION, DISAPPOINTED by the failure of voluntary guidelines, is considering new rules on car advertising which would guarantee a prominent position for environmental information. At the moment ads typically relegate fuel economy and carbon dioxide emission figures to barely legible print. Based on cigarette health warnings, there would be a 20% of total space rule in print adverts and/or a 'traffic light' system to rank vehicles by pollution. A two-month consultation period is now in full swing with loud protests from print media bodies, who fear for their vital revenue from car ads, and German manufacturers who produce the biggest models with the highest emissions. They are supported by Commissioner for Industry, Gunter Verheugen: 'This is enough now. Fingers off advertising! Advertising belongs to the free-market' he said. However the Commission as a whole is 'committed to [ensuring] that consumers have sufficient information to choose fuel-efficient and low-emitting cars'.

High-tech jobs increasing but male workers still outnumber the women

A RECENT REPORT BY THE EU STATISTICS ORGANISATION Eurostat surveys employment in high-tech sectors of the EU economy. These encompass manufacturing that includes much research and development, such as the pharmaceuticals industry, as well as computer-related, knowledge-intensive services. While it finds that employment has increased in these occupations in the last few years, women workers are still in a substantial minority. Only in Lithuania and Slovakia do women make up more than 50% of the high-tech workforce in a sector that accounts for 4.4% of total employment in the EU, more than 9 million people. The UK is in a shameful last place in the league table with only 25.3%.

In absolute terms, Germany has the most high-tech employees with about two million or about one-fifth of the total, France and the UK coming next, just above the one million mark. When broken down into regions the figures show capital city regions doing well with Île de France (including Paris) in pole position and South-East England not far behind. It seems that you don't have to get a degree to work in high-tech but it helps. In 2006 39.5% of techies had university-level qualifications compared with 25.7% in the whole EU economy.

HighTechWomenChart.jpg


Web prices to be equalised by EU Commission

EVER WONDERED WHY IT COSTS MORE to book a train ticket from London to Paris that it does coming the other way? So has the EU Commission and now they want to do something about it. Consumer Protection Commissioner Meglena Kuneva plans to take companies to task who vary their prices across Europe and then restrict customers to using only their 'national web site'. One MEP has cited Eurostar as charging €1,082 for return tickets for a family of four on its UK site while the same journey could be had for €600 on the French version, though the company denies this.

Retail internet companies like Ebay also blame manufacturers for using loopholes in current competition law to restrict online buying and selling. Ms. Kuneva will also put forward a new law to create a 'single, simple set of core rights and obligations' dealing with issues such as return periods and guarantee terms, both on the net and in shops. Internet commerce should be a way of ironing out price differences between countries according to the EU and consumers groups like BEUC. 'For many consumers, online shopping is the only way to benefit from the internal market' said Monique Goyens, director-general of the European consumers' umbrella group.

'Mind the Gap' software highlights world disparities

SOFTWARE PIONEERED BY SWEDISH ACADEMICS has been so successful in illustrating the gap between rich and poor countries that Internet giant Google has snapped up the product. Originally inspired by the United Nations Millennium Development Goals, the Gapminder Foundation used their own 'Trendalyzer' system to display statistics on infant mortality, income per person, life expectancy and CO2 emissions in an animated and interactive way. Later extended to education, technology, trade and energy figures, the system can be used to create presentations and videos from its attractive timelines of moving coloured circles. Now Google have released 'Motion Chart' which lets the user add their own statistics.

Trendalyzer.jpg

A 'Trendalyzer' graph available at:
http://www.gapminder.org


Stats and facts

Eurostat Yearbook shows wide variation in labour costs

'Europe in figures' is the straightforward title of the new 2008 yearbook published by the EU statistics office, Eurostat. Among a morass of interesting tables and graphs we can only mention a selection. The first chapter concerns itself with population marking an increase of 16 million in the current EU Member States since 1997. Ireland recorded the highest growth at 18% with the UK at 4.5%, while much of Eastern Europe suffered a decline, the steepest fall being in Bulgaria: -7.9%.

The other fourteen chapters of the publication cover the economy as well as education, health, science, transport and the environment. Under housing the yearbook reveals that 88% of Estonians own their own home yet Germans are more content to rent as this is the only country where there are more tenants than owner-occupiers. The British figures are 68.5% homeowners against 31.5% tenants. In tourism, Spain accounted for nearly a quarter of all nights spent in hotels by foreigners in 2007 though the Germans were keenest to sleep away from home in their own country, booking 298 million nights in accommodation in Germany. The labour market figures show that it is nearly twenty times more expensive to employ a worker in Sweden as in Bulgaria with more of the cost being made up from employer contributions to social security than in any other Member State.

Member State

Average hourly labour costs (€)

% wages

% employer's social security

Sweden

Sweden.gif


32.2

66.2

30.6

Denmark

Denmark.gif


32.0

86.7

10.9

Luxembourg

Luxembourg.gif


32.0

83.9

15.2

Belgium

Belgium.gif


31.6

69.2

30.3

France

France.gif


30.3

67.1

28.6

Germany

Germany.gif


27.7

76.3

23.3

Netherlands

Netherlands.gif


27.4

76.9

21.0

Finland

Finland.gif


27.4

78.0

20.8

Austria

Austria.gif


26.7

73.2

24.0

United Kingdom

UK.gif


24.5

79.2

18.4

Italy

Italy.gif


21.4

EU 27

EU logo


20.4

Spain

Spain.gif


15.8

73.4

24.9

Greece

Greece.gif


13.4

78.8

21.7

Cyprus

Cyprus.gif


12.0

84.9

15.1

Slovenia

Slovenia.gif


11.3

82.6

13.4

Portugal

Portugal.gif


11.0

77.5

21.2

Malta

Malta.gif


8.7

93.1

6.9

Czech Republic

Czech.gif


7.1

72.6

26.1

Hungary

Hungary.gif


6.3

69.1

26.9

Poland

Poland.gif


6.0

80.2

16.6

Estonia

Estonia.gif


5.5

73.6

25.1

Slovakia

Slovakia.gif


5.3

75.0

24.1

Lithuania

Lithuania.gif


4.2

71.5

28.2

Latvia

Latvia.gif


3.4

78.7

20.6

Romania

Romania.gif


2.7

72.1

26.1

Bulgaria

Bulgaria.gif


1.7

78.5

20.9

Figures are for 2006 except Greece, 2003; Italy, 2004; Denmark, Netherlands, UK and Poland, 2005. No stats available for Ireland.

'Europe in figures - Eurostat Yearbook 2008' is available free of charge from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat

Poorer countries and poorer people spend more on food

The recent Eurostat Household Budget Survey has shown that what might be thought a 'common sense' view has a basis in fact. The poorer you are the more of your income you spend on food, and this applies to countries as well as individuals. The survey found the less wealthy east European Member States at the top of the league for spending on 'food, beverages and tobacco' with Romanians getting through half their income under this heading. On average 15% of the expenditure of the wealthiest fifth of households throughout the EU goes on food etc. whereas the figure for the poorest fifth is 25%. Conversely in the categories of transport, recreation and culture, and restaurants and hotels the rich spend more of their income.

Member State (% of household expenditure by category)

Food, beverages and tobacco

Housing

Transport

Romania

Romania.gif


50.0

19.4

6.5

Lithuania

Lithuania.gif


37.3

23.1

8.1

Bulgaria

Bulgaria.gif


35.3

37.7

5.0

Latvia

Latvia.gif


32.3

22.3

10.9

Slovakia

Slovakia.gif


30.1

28.8

9.2

Poland

Poland.gif


28.0

36.0

8.1

Hungary

Hungary.gif


26.2

24.1

14.1

Estonia

Estonia.gif


25.3

35.1

10.0

Malta

Malta.gif


24.0

19.8

16.6

Czech Republic

Czech.gif


23.5

26.8

11.1

Italy

Italy.gif


20.4

35.4

11.9

Spain

Spain.gif


20.3

35.0

10.5

EU 27

EU logo


19.4

33.1

11.9

Slovenia

Slovenia.gif


19.1

28.8

15.6

Greece

Greece.gif


18.9

30.2

10.4

Ireland

Ireland.gif


17.9

30.6

11.6

Portugal

Portugal.gif


17.8

31.4

12.9

Cyprus

Cyprus.gif


17.0

27.5

14.6

Austria

Austria.gif


15.8

28.5

16.1

Belgium

Belgium.gif


15.7

30.9

12.9

France

France.gif


15.7

32.4

13.5

Denmark

Denmark.gif


15.2

36.0

13.8

Finland

Finland.gif


15.1

32.3

15.7

Germany

Germany.gif


12.9

35.0

13.3

Netherlands

Netherlands.gif


12.6

32.0

10.9

Sweden

Sweden.gif


12.4

35.5

13.0

United Kingdom

UK.gif


12.3

36.1

13.5

Luxembourg

Luxembourg.gif


11.0

37.2

16.2

Figures are for 2005

Tutor brings TUC know-how to war crimes court

Darren O'Grady is a tutor at the Trade Union Studies Centre of South Thames College. Recently he was asked to assist in the training of union reps at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia based at The Hague in the Netherlands .

A trade union was formed for staff working for the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in 1993, representing workers across all grades and nationalities. The union has adopted an organising model which has succeeded in recruiting around 80% of eligible membership, the highest level of any United Nations agency.

It has been proactive in seeking members' views and involving them in all aspects of the work of the union, developing an effective network of workplace representatives in the process. This has enabled the organisation to seize the initiative in a number of areas and led to the establishment of a Joint Negotiating Committee and similar bodies for health and safety, communications etc.

The union requested training for their representatives from the UK TUC, which has aided the development of their organisation. As a TUC tutor based in London I was asked to run two courses for the union. The first course was a 3-day induction for new reps. There were also reps present from the International Labour Organisation (ILO), United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) and the International Criminal Court (ICC), though the majority were from ICTY. The content was very similar to that which runs in the UK, covering areas such as the role of the rep., recruiting and organising, looking at agreements and action planning. TUC training is based on experiential learning, where representatives build on their own experiences to develop strategies to go back into the workplace, with a concentration on skills development. The reps were very focused and contributed to a high level of discussion; some very productive ideas were developed around building the union.

The second course was for ICTY union committee members and was based around the Completion Strategy that ICTY are proposing. This reflects the fact that the ICTY is a United Nations ad hoc agency rather than a permanent one and the intention is to wind up the organisation over the next couple of years. Consequently there are many issues of concern for the workforce around redeployment, training for new skills and so on. Again this would be very similar to the sort of training we would be involved in with workers in the UK.

ICTY4.jpg

The ICTY building in The Hague

However the ICTY union have a number of very specific issues. Over the years, many of their members have settled in The Hague where the tribunal is located, sending their children to local schools and becoming part of the local community. Yet for those from outside the EU as many of the staff are, predominantly from the former Yugoslavia, there is no right to residency once their jobs end. In certain parts of the former Yugoslavia the people found guilty of war crimes are seen as national heroes, and locals would not look favourably on those who have worked for ICTY. There would be a very good chance of them being ostracised with the threat of physical violence being likely.

Del
Former Chief Prosecutor Carla Del Ponte

The union has been campaigning hard around such issues, lobbying the Dutch government, EU as well as UN bodies on their members' behalf and has made many gains. The training course was an opportunity for the committee members, nearly all of whom are unpaid workplace reps, to discuss and plan out a strategy to tackle the very difficult issues that the union faces.

As a trade unionist it was a fascinating experience for me to work with these colleagues, who have built a very effective union in adverse circumstances. As a trade union educator it was rewarding to be part of a process where colleagues appreciated the link between union training and organising in the workplace, and utilised the opportunity to the full. Finally, as a human being, it was an absolute pleasure to meet and enjoy the hospitality of such a wonderful collection of people!

Diary: conferences and courses

EUROSHNET - Safer products for competitive workplaces. European Conference on standardisation testing and certification 11-12 September

EUROSHNET2008, Hotel Sheraton, ul. Powšle 7, Cracow, POLAND
Katarznya Buszkiewicz-Seferyn
Tel: +48-22-623-3678
Fax: +48-22-840-0811
Email: kabus@ciop.pl

Anticipating and managing change in the metal working industry 28-30 September

ETUI-REHS Education, Protarus, Cyprus
Jean Claude Le Douaron
Tel: +32-2-224-0543
Email: jcledoua@etui-rehs.org

TUC Organising Academy - Building Stronger Unions: Organising the Future 14 October

TUC, Congress House, Great Russell Street, London WC1B 3LS
Joanne Adams
Tel: 020 7467 1361
Email: jadams@tuc.org.uk

Training young European trade union leaders 18-23 October

ETUI-REHS Education, Boulevard du Roi Albert II, 5, box 7, B1210, Brussels, BELGIUM
Valerica Dumitrescu
Tel: +32-2-224-0528
Email: vdumitrescu@etui-rehs.org

Newsletter (7,300 words) issued 7 Aug 2008

unionlearn
Congress House
Great Russell Street
London WC1B 3LS

Telephone 020 7079 6920
Fax 020 7079 6921
Email ulweb@tuc.org.uk

Further contacts | About us

 

Copyright © Trades Union Congress 2008, unless otherwise stated, all rights reserved.

unionlearn
Congress House
Great Russell Street
London WC1B 3LS

Telephone 020 7079 6920
Fax 020 7079 6921
Email ulweb@tuc.org.uk

This page http://www.unionlearn.org.uk/education/learn-2347-f0.cfm
printed 5 December 2008 at 11:07 hrs by 38.103.63.61